Service Hotline: 13823761625

Support

Contact Us

You are here:Home >> Support >> Technology

Technology

Synchronous or asynchronous? Select the right DC-DC converter to ensure boost system performance

Time:2024-06-03 Views:77
introduction
    Did you know that for every 10°C increase in the environment, component life is reduced by 50%? [1] Will a steep drop or change in power supply cause premature failure or even complete burnout of system components? In fact, most people believe that power sensitive products require a durable and efficient power supply, which is essential. But what structure? Synchronous or asynchronous? Let‘s discuss the pros and cons of each of these two structures.
Power supply selection
    Every hardware system requires a power supply, and the power supply voltage is mostly higher than the circuit requirements. For example, the power input is 9V, and it needs to be reduced to 5V to ensure the normal operation of the system. You have the following options:
    1. Parallel regulators with basic voltage regulation functions, such as Zener diodes. The Zener diode and its current limiting resistance reduce the voltage from 9V to 5V, and the Zener diode current limiting resistance has a voltage drop of 4V. This method generates heat and wastes energy.
    2.   5V linear Regulator (LDO). Similarly, if the input is 9V, the output is 5V; The pressure drop on the LDO is 4V. If the circuit consumes 1A current, the LDO dissipates 4W power. It can also be said that the wasted 4W of power is released as heat.
    DC-DC converter. In this way, the switch performs pulse width modulation (i.e. PWM) on the output inductance and capacitance. When the output voltage reaches 5V and the PWM duty cycle drops to near zero, the current consumed by the switch is very small, and the power loss of the response is also very low. This is undoubtedly the most efficient design choice.
    3. The input voltage of DC-DC converter can be any value, the standard value is 6V, 9V, 12V, 24V, 48V. Transformers reduce 120VAC to a standard voltage, then rectifier, filter, and adjust to a DC voltage for commercial or industrial equipment. For example, the phone system uses 48V, which is determined by the battery backup voltage. If the AC grid goes down, the battery backup system will be seamless. Portable devices are a different matter. These devices generally use DC power from the battery output, but require further voltage regulation. Because the battery voltage drops after a certain period of time, the output voltage needs to be boosted to maintain stability. If the system is operating at 3.3V, it needs to be maintained at 3.3V even if the battery voltage drops.
    In the design of the power supply, you can choose a "seemingly" low cost solution, such as the simple parallel regulator or Zener diode described above. Note that the reason we say "seemingly" low cost is only because it looks that way on the bill of materials. These methods have hidden and additional power consumption costs, which cause the system to heat up and shorten the life of the electronic components. In addition, the LDO output noise is very low, but the disadvantage is high power consumption, large differential pressure, and short battery life.
    Designers are now turning to DC-DC converters to achieve an optimal balance of output in terms of efficiency, heat dissipation, accuracy, transient response, and cost. Simple and direct is a good choice... But the process of achieving an optimal DC-DC power supply design is like navigating a minefield without a map. The operating temperature of the converter limits the maximum output power, and the operating temperature increases with the reduction of the size of the industrial equipment. In addition, most units generally do not have forced cooling/ventilation or have very limited cooling conditions. So, what‘s the best option for DC-DC?
DC-DC design selection
    Now, let‘s talk about asynchronous and synchronous DC-DC converter architectures, which each have advantages and disadvantages. The asynchronous structure is an older design, notable for the power consumption of the external Schottky diode. This power consumption is equivalent to a reduction in efficiency. We recommend the synchronous structure because of the high efficiency of the internal MOSFETs, which are suitable for smaller sizes. The structural difference between an asynchronous converter and a more integrated synchronization scheme is shown in Figure 1.
    DC-DC converter, synchronous or non-synchronous? Figure 1. Non-synchronous DC-DC converter structure (left) uses an external Schottky diode to regulate voltage; The synchronous structure (right) replaces the Schottky diode with an integrated MOSFET.
    Consider power efficiency. In recent years, analog IC manufacturers have introduced synchronous DC-DC converters to improve power efficiency and compensate for the power consumption of the non-synchronous architecture of external Schottky diodes. Now, synchronous converters integrate low-side power MOSFETs in place of external high-loss Schottky diodes. The RON of a low-edge MOSFET affects the power consumption, while the forward bias VD of the diode determines the power consumption of the Schottky diode. If the current of the two designs remains the same, the MOSFET voltage drop is generally less than the diode voltage drop, so the MOSFET power consumption is lower.
    The power consumption of the diode in the asynchronous scheme is:
    PD = VD × IOUT ×(1 – VOUT/VIN)
    The power consumption of the MOSFET in the synchronization scheme is:
    PFET = RON × I²OUT × (1 – VOUT/VIN)
    However, it has been suggested that asynchronous buck converters are more efficient at light loads and high duty ratios [2], and it appears that no single converter can be optimized for efficiency from light to heavy loads. Power system designers are once again in a "dilemma" situation [3]?
    To answer this question, consider the main driving force behind the high efficiency of asynchronous converters under light load conditions. In asynchronous converters, inductance current flows only in one direction and cannot be negative. In a synchronous converter, the current flows in both directions, which is a disadvantage.
    DC-DC converter, synchronous or non-synchronous? Figure 2. Current flow in synchronous and asynchronous converters.
    In order to overcome the bidirectional current in the synchronous converter, different operating modes are designed to form a "pseudo-synchronous" mode under light load. Modern DC-DC converters support three modes (Figure 3) :
    1. PWM@CCM: Pulse width modulation in continuous conduction mode. At this time, the converter works at a constant frequency; IL is allowed to be negative. This mode allows the converter to respond quickly to any load change, even down to zero load, while still ensuring minimal output voltage ripple. However, PWM@CCM mode is less efficient under light load.
    2. PWM@DCM: Pulse width modulation in non-continuous conduction mode. This method also uses a constant frequency, but improves efficiency at light loads by preventing IL from being negative. The negative inductive current is prohibited under light load, which is similar to the non-synchronous scheme.
    3. PFM mode with deep sleep: Pulse frequency modulation with deep sleep mode. This method improves the efficiency by preventing IL from being negative and switching off two FETs at light load. During the jump pulse, the converter goes into deep sleep mode, at which time the internal circuit that is not in use is turned off to save static current. This mode achieves the best possible efficiency and has the highest light-load efficiency, the disadvantage is only that the output voltage ripple is slightly higher.
    DC-DC converter, synchronous or non-synchronous? Figure 3. Multiple operating modes of Maxim Integrated Himalayan DC-DC buck converter.
When the load current is medium to full load, all modes work in the same way; The difference is when the load current is reduced to less than half of the inductor current ripple.
    Does your system spend most of its time on standby (that is, working with a low load) and focus on battery life? The PFM mode can be chosen because it has the highest light-load efficiency. One thing to note about PFM mode: Check to make sure that higher output ripple and slower transient response do not adversely affect system performance during standby.
    Transient performance under light loads is particularly important for your application? Then the PWM @CCM mode is the best choice, this mode has the best transient response, even if the load drops to zero.
    The PWM @DCM mode is the best balance between the other two modes.
conclusion
    Technology continues to advance, using integrated high-efficiency MOSFETs instead of external Schottky diodes, and using multiple modes of operation, synchronous solutions provide outstanding efficiency in the vast majority of compact designs. The new synchronization technology improves the power performance of the next generation design, making the overall design simpler, lower operating temperature, and better performance.







   
      
      
   
   


    Disclaimer: This article is transferred from other platforms and does not represent the views and positions of this site. If there is any infringement or objection, please contact us to delete it. thank you!
    矽源特科技ChipSourceTek